Anthony Bowyer Comments on the Changes to Kazakhstan's Election Law
January 15, 2009
While the move adopted by the Majilis is a step forward, there needs to be a recognition that a vibrant political system with an active opposition is in Kazakhstan’s best interest. This is true not only to meet the qualifications required by its impending Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) Chair-in-Office duties in 2010, but also to genuinely promote dialogue among the many competing voices in Kazakhstan and give greater opportunities for representation of those voices at the highest levels of government.
With this new law, political parties outside of the pro-presidential super party Nur Otan remain exceptionally weak. Although the next scheduled parliamentary elections are not until 2012, opposition political parties have a long way to go in order to be competitive under any circumstances. It is still unclear how exactly the seats would be allocated to a party winning the second-highest amount of votes (though less than the 7% threshold) under the new rules, such as how many deputies would be seated or what would happen in the case of a bloc of parties finishing second.
Lowering the threshold from 7% to a lower number in the present system of proportional representation would also be a welcome move, though in itself it is not a panacea for creating a functional multi-party democracy. Political parties, and especially those in the opposition, need to genuinely be able to conduct their activities openly and increase their base of support in order to be competitive. After the election law changes of 2007 they had but several weeks to prepare for early parliamentary elections, which predictably resulted in a clean sweep of all 98 Majilis seats by Nur Otan. They must have equal access to the media, equal rights for conducting their pre-election activities, and first and foremost be given sufficient opportunity to register candidates. The reduction in the amount of signatures required is also a necessary move in that regard.
Anthony Bowyer is program manager for the Caucasus & Central Asia.
Civil Society,
Elections
Islamic Movements and Democracy in Central Asia: Integration or Isolation?
June 12, 2008
This paper, presented at the Center for the Study of Islam and Democracy’s 9th Annual Conference in Washington, DC, addresses the present state of Islamic political movements in the Central Asian states of Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, and Kyrgyzstan, with focus on state and non-state actors.
A Guide to Creating Community Schools: The Approach and Experiences of Five Countries in Eurasia (2005)
June 24, 2005
This handbook was created on the basis of eight years of experience in the development of a community school model that was developed in Siberia and documentary material for how it is being implemented successfully today in 5 countries: Armenia, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan and Russia. The purpose for this book is fourfold:
1. Provide a step-by-step approach to developing a community school (CS) for those who are interested in implementing this idea.
2. Introduce some advanced community development technologies for those who are already using the model.
3. To respond to one of the greatest needs in the community school movement today by providing an opportunity for community school practitioners to exchange information about their experiences.
4. To demonstrate that the community school model is a very effective mechanism for mobilizing the community to address their needs in the widest range of social, economic and political environments.
Civil Society