Tools & Resources
Filter by
Type
Publication date
Language
Type
Publication date
Language
Election Material
Ballot
Finland Parliamentary Ballot 1958 #3
Ballot used for Parliamentary elections in Finland on 6-7 July 1958.
Election Material
Ballot
Finland Parliamentary Ballot 1958 #2
Ballot used for the 1958 Parliamentary election in Finland.
Election Material
Ballot
Finland Parliamentary Ballot 1958
Ballot used for Parliamentary elections in Finland on 6-7 July 1958.
Election Material
Constitution
The 1980 Constitution of The Arab Republic of Egypt
Constitution of Egypt adopted by referendum in 1980.
Election Material
Constitution
Constitutional Laws of Finland: Procedure of Parliament
A compilation of the Constitution Act of Finland, the Parliament Act, the Procedure of Parliament, Ministerial Responsibility Act, and Act on the High Court of Impeachment.
Election Material
Constitution
Finnische Grundgesetze Geschäftsordnung Des Parlaments
Fundamental Laws of Finland (German Translation).
Election Material
Constitution
Les Lois Fondamentales De Finlande: Reglements De La Chambre Des Representants
Fundamental Laws of Finland (French Translation).
Election Material
Constitution
The Constitution of Finland
Constitution of Finland adopted in 1999 to replace the previous 1919 Constitution.
Publication
Report/Paper
State of the Judiciary: Egypt 2003
The author of this State of the Judiciary Report for Egypt chose to remain anonymous. This State of the Judiciary report was commissioned by the Arab Center for the Rule of Law and Integrity (ACRLI), a Lebanese non-governmental organization founded to strengthen the Rule of Law, fight societal and governmental corruption and build the foundations of fair, efficient and independent justice systems within the Arab world. This State of the Judiciary Report for Egypt was edited by Professor Keith Henderson, IFES Senior Rule of Law Advisor, and Violaine Autheman, IFES Rule of Law Advisor, who are also the sole authors of the Executive Summary and of Chapter 1 of this Report. They are also entirely responsible for the analytical conclusions in the Judicial Integrity Principles Index (JIP), which attempts to evaluate the level of compliance with the Judicial Integrity Principles, included in the Executive Summary and in Annex 2. It should be noted they are also solely responsible for edits made to the English version and thus accept full responsibility for any inadvertent errors or misinterpretations of the Report from Arabic to English.
March 31, 2004