Tools & Resources
Filter by
Type
Publication date
Language
Type
Publication date
Language
Publication
Report/Paper
Judicial Reform in China
A presentation created by participants in IFES' Judicial Fellows' Program
December 30, 1969
Election Material
Constitution
Constitution of The People's Republic of China
Constitution of The People's Republic of China (1982)
Publication
Report/Paper
Report on the Election in the Republic of China on December 2, 1989
This 1989 report on elections in China summarizes the various Chinese political institutions, the contemporary political scene, pre-election observations and the role and structure of major political parties and special interest groups and the voting procedure. The report concludes with a documentation of the results of the election. The report also includes an organigram of the Chinese political structure and several drawings of the voting process.
December 31, 1989
Publication
Report/Paper
Angola: Assessment of Proposed Voter Registration Process and Elections in Angola
This report contains information about preparations for the 1992 elections in Angola. It contains details on the organization of and findings from a 1991 seminar organized by the Angolan government concerning elections and voter registration. The report is divided into 5 sections: the Introduction (Section One); notes of meetings and discussions; summary of information and details of the work (Section Two); Seminar Program work
(Section Three); summary of proceedings at the Seminar (Section Four); and conclusions and an
overview of the assessment position (Section Five).
October 31, 1991
Election Material
Ballot
Angola Presidential Ballot 1992
Ballot used for Presidential elections in Algeria on 29 and 30 September 1992. The main candidates in the election were Jose Eduardo DOS SANTOS and Jonas SAVIMBI. The 1992 election was the most recent direct presidential election in Angola.
Publication
Report/Paper
Angola Presidential and Legislative Elections, September 29-30 1992, Report of the IFES Observation Mission
This report summarizes IFES findings regarding Angola’s September 29-30, 1992 legislative and presidential elections. The report discusses the framework of the elections, election assistance, election preparations, election day observations and IFES recommendations.
September 30, 1992
Publication
Report/Paper
Hong Kong Elections: Transition to Autonomy
This report on the Hong Kong elections discusses the institutions involved with the election process, the issues currently under debate and the potential avenues of participation by the Secretariat in the transitional election process.
June 24, 1997
Publication
Electoral Assessment
Angola Pre-Election Assessment Report (2001)
From August 4-20, 2001, the International Foundation for Election Systems (IFES), the International Republican Institute (IRI) and the National Democratic Institute (NDI) conducted a joint pre-election assessment in Angola. The objective of the assessment was to: (1) Determine the prospects for holding general elections at such a time when the conditions that affect elections are conducive to a participatory and open process; and (2) Provide a set of baseline data from which to assess the readiness of Angola for elections and to make recommendations to the Government of the Republic of Angola, United States Government, the United Nations organizations in Luanda, and other donors, in preparation for such elections, including a timeline by which key actions need to occur.
February 28, 2002
Publication
Report/Paper
Global Lessons and Best Practices: Fighting Corruption and Promoting the Rule of Law Through Transparency, Openness and Judicial Independence
IFES believes all countries, including China, should publish an annual State of the Judiciary Report that will serve as both an internal and external tool that can be used by multiple stakeholders for multiple purposes, including promoting and systematically reporting on needed reforms and key issues. It should be disseminated to the public at large, as well as to targeted stakeholders, such as the business and human rights communities, bar associations, judges, reformers, policy-makers and donors. We believe the publication and distribution of the report will increase the quality and quantity of concrete information on the judiciary, more transparency, accountability and public awareness, qualitative comparative research and valuable cross-country lessons learned and judicial competition. We invite and challenge you to demonstrate your firm commitment to the important task ahead.
January 19, 2006