Tools & Resources
Filter by
Type
Publication date
Language
Type
Publication date
Language
Publication
Report/Paper
Report of the International Delegaton Studying the Development of the Mongolian Electoral System, 3-10 December 1991
This report summarizes the findings of an IFES international Delegation which studied the development of the Mongolian Election system in the post USSR context. The observations address The Political Environment, the Constitutional System, the Political Party System, and the Election System as we found them.
February 29, 1992
Publication
Report/Paper
Mongolia: An Assessment of the Election to the Great Peoples Hural - June 1992
This report summarizes IFES findings from observing the national legislative elections in Mongolia on June 28, 1992. These were the first elections conducted in Mongolia under its new constitution.
June 30, 1992
Publication
Report/Paper
Report on Mongolian Presidential Election: June 6, 1993
This report on the 1993 Mongolian Presidential Election contextualizes the political atmosphere in Mongolia and provides a host of recommendations for future elections in Mongolia.
June 30, 1993
Publication
Report/Paper
Maroc Elections Legislatives Directes 25 juin 1993: Rapport des Delegations de Responables du Suivi et d'Observateurs de l'IFES
This on-site assessment conducted by IFES in Mozambique in 1997 discusses voter registration law, electoral law, voter registration and election training.
August 31, 1993
Publication
Report/Paper
Morocco Direct Legislative Elections Monitoring/Observation Report, June 25, 1993
This report is issued as a record of the observations made by an IFES team. It is a presentation of a series of technical suggestions for the consideration of the Moroccan government in the organization and facilitation of future elections.
August 31, 1993
Publication
Report/Paper
Pre-Election Technical Assessment, October 1998
This report summarizes IFES findings from an onsite assessment of the status of reform measures, timetable for democratic elections and what remained to be done before elections in Indonesia. The document details the choices for a voting system, election administration authorities, political parties, voter lists and registration and campaign finance.
September 30, 1998
Publication
Report/Paper
IFES Survey of the Indonesian Electorate
IFES Survey conducted Dec.-Feb. in Indonesia by Insight (PT. Insightindo Arya Dhanna); Analysis by Steven Wagner; Sample of 1507 nationally representative adults (18+); Margin of sampling error is ±2.5%
February 28, 1999
Publication
Report/Paper
Association of Asian Election Authorities (AAEA): Observation Mission Report, Indonesian General Elections June 1999
June 7, 1999, marked a turning point in the history of democracy in the Republic of Indonesia. After nearly 40 years of dictatorial rule and sham elections, over 100 million Indonesian voters were given a true electoral choice, a choice that will chart their country's future. This report summarizes the Association of Asian Election Authorities’ election observation mission, facilitated by IFES for the Indonesian general parliamentary elections. It describes the mission’s activities, and its evaluation of the elections.
May 31, 1999
Publication
Report/Paper
Experience Gained from June 1999 Elections: Resolving Complaints and Disputes in the Election Process
On September 15, 1999, a conference was held at the University of Indonesia to review experience gained in the area of complaint adjudication and dispute resolution during the June elections for legislative assemblies in Indonesia.
August 31, 1999
Publication
Survey
Survey of the Indonesian Electorate Following the June 1999 Elections
This report presents the results of a survey of public opinion conducted in Indonesia from August 14-29, 1999. Interviews were completed with a sample of 1520 randomly selected adults (17+ years of age) throughout the country. In keeping with the standard practice of the IFES survey research program, this survey was intended insofar as possible to be nationally representative of the entire adult population of Indonesia. What this means, as a practical matter, is that every adult citizen of Indonesia ought to have had the same chance of being selected for participation in the survey. Great effort was made to conduct interviews in all regions of the country (although some regions were excluded for security and practical reasons), in both cities and rural areas, in Indonesian and local languages. These measures were intended to keep to a minimum the size of any population which was systematically excluded from participation in the survey. In the end, we conducted interviews in 22 of 27 provinces; excluded were Dista Aceh and East Timor (for reasons of interviewer safety), and Central Kalimantan, Maluku and Irian Jaya (for logistical reasons). The DPR election in June was a watershed event, both in the history of Indonesia and in the impact on public opinion. The experience of the election was positive for most Indonesians, because the actual voting was well executed and because of the more general perception that this election was real, ushering in a new Democratic era. As an apparent consequence, pro-Democratic sentiment has solidified in Indonesia. The percentage of Indonesians who consider Indonesia to be primarily a democracy more than doubled, from 33 percent at the beginning of the year to 74 percent after the election. The percentage who says Indonesia should be a democracy rose from 70 percent to 86 percent during the same period.
August 31, 1999